Skip to main content

Survey finding

Misted windows on your survey: replacement cost

Low

Failed window seals are a routine Cat 1 finding. This page covers the realistic costs.

Last updated: 6 May 2026. Editorially reviewed: 20 May 2026.

Popular right now

or pick one

Finding

UPVC window seal failure

Low

What this usually means

Misted double-glazed units indicate failed perimeter seals, allowing moisture into the cavity. The fix is replacement of the unit (the glass), not the entire window frame.

Why it matters

Low severity. Cosmetic and minor energy loss. Often a negotiation point on otherwise sound houses.

Ask your surveyor

  • Check:How many units have failed?
  • Check:Are the frames serviceable, or is replacement needed?

Ask the seller

  • Check:Are window guarantees available?
  • Check:When were the windows installed?

Next steps

  • Get two written quotes from local trades before negotiating with the seller.
  • Speak to your mortgage broker before exchanging if the finding affects mortgageability.

Browse all findings

Free property preview

Cross-check this finding with EPC, building age, and address-specific risk data.

What you need to know

Severity

1/ 5

Cosmetic. Note for budget but not a negotiation lever in itself.

Typical cost to fix

Single unit replacement £80-£200 each. Whole-house replacement of failed units £400-£1,500.

Mortgage impact

None.

Insurance impact

None.

When to pull out

Not relevant.

When to renegotiate, and by how much

Cost per unit times number affected; typical £400-£1,500 reduction.

Thinking of pulling out or renegotiating? What to do after a bad survey

Run the check on this address

The Survey Decoder explains the wording. The full report adds address-specific flood, subsidence, EPC, crime, listed status, building age and price comparison data, so a single finding isn't judged in isolation.

Run the check

Check the property before you offer

Flood, subsidence, EPC, crime, schools, transport, broadband, tenure, age, listed status and price checks where data is available.

Run a free preview

Editorial review

Editorial owner: BiteRight Ltd, operator of MyPropertyScan. We review buyer guides against UK public property datasets, RICS survey wording, lender requirements, and common buyer questions.

Pages are updated when source coverage, property-risk guidance, survey cost assumptions, or product checks materially change. Methodology and dataset limitations are explained on the MyPropertyScan methodology page.

Sources used

We use UK public and specialist sources where they are available. Public datasets can be incomplete, delayed, or missing for some addresses. Treat them as a starting point, not as a replacement for professional advice.

Source standard: preference goes to official government datasets, statutory bodies, professional standards, and primary dataset publishers. We cite the source family on the page and explain coverage limits rather than filling gaps with unsupported estimates.

We use a minimal set of analytics to understand which pages help buyers and which don't. No advertising cookies, no third-party tracking. You can decline and the site works the same. Privacy policy.